Gwen D. Hughes, a former California nursing home director, was sentenced on Wednesday to three years in state prison for inappropriately medicating patients at a Kern County nursing home. The San Francisco Chronicle reported that Hughes was originally charged in the deaths of three patients. Hughes however pleaded no contest in October to one felony count of elder abuse with a special allegation that the abuse contributed to the victim’s death, according to the article.

Hughes was working as nursing home director at Kern Valley Healthcare District’s facility in Lake Isabella at the time of the alleged crimes. California Department of Justice officials, including Attorney General Kamala D. Harris, allege that Hughes ordered the director of pharmacy to write doctor’s orders for psychotropic medication for 23 patients.

The prescriptions were not written for health or therapeutic reasons, but instead written to “keep them quiet” says the article. The Justice Officials allege that the psychotropic drugs were given to patients who were “noisy, prone to wandering, who complained about conditions or were argumentative” according to the article. This is clearly an example of nursing home abuse.

According to the Orange County Register, local officials believe that a 28-year-old Riverside resident named David Moreno may have assaulted numerous victims while working as a maintenance worker at Emeritus Senior Living in Yorba Linda. Officials are asking if anyone has information regarding the matter, to please contact the Orange County District Attorney’s Office.

Moreno is already facing a felony sexual battery on an institutional victim charge and a felony sexual penetration by a foreign object of an incompetent victim charge. These acts allegedly occurred in June or July of 2012 when Moreno went into the room of a resident suffering from dementia.

Moreno plead guilty and is free on a $100,000 bail.

One of the rights addressed in the Nursing Home Residents’ Bill of Rights relates to the Quality of Life in the nursing home. An individual’s quality of life should not be diminished because he or she resides in a nursing home. Now, an individual’s opportunities to engage in all of the typical social activities in the community might decline because of health related issues, but the individual must still be permitted to engage in activities within the nursing home and community that he or she is medically and financially able to engage in.xmasinnursinghome.jpg

There are a couple of specific clauses addressing the quality of life in nursing home:

A resident must be allowed to choose and participate in activities that he or she likes provided that the activities are part of his or her plan of care. (HSC 1599.1(d): 42CFR 483.15(b)(1). Clearly the nursing home medical staff will have a say in which activities a resident participates in especially if the activities involve physical activity. The nursing home has a duty to care for the residents and ensure their safety so there is some limitation on activities. However, residents cannot be forced to engage in activities that they do not wish to engage in.

A resident of a nursing home is no different than any other citizen in the United States when it comes to his or her rights and protections. Living in a nursing facility does not mean you give up your rights despite the new and oftentimes more controlled environment, as opposed to living independently. Each nursing home must inform residents of their rights and provide a written description of those legal rights. They must do so in a manner or language that the resident comprehends. Residents must be given the written description of their rights prior to admission and must acknowledge in writing that they received them.

Money is a topic addressed in a patient’s rights. According to the Federal Government, residents have the right to manage their own money or to choose someone to do if for them.

money-42955_640.png

This is straightforward, but as with anything that involves money it can get complicated. Residents can deposit funds with the nursing home and ask that the nursing home hold the funds for them. Before doing so, the resident must sign a written statement authorizing the nursing home to hold the funds. A resident may also ask that the nursing home manage and account for personal funds, but the written authorization is again needed here. The nursing home must give the resident access to any bank accounts or funds that it is holding for the resident. Residents may take advantage of this service, but they are not required to deposit personal funds with the nursing home.

Glendale attorney, Russ Balisok, alleges on behalf of his clients California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform, in a new lawsuit, that state regulators allow nursing home companies to siphon money away from patient care and send it to the wallets of the corporations that manage the facilities.

Current state law allows nursing homes to outsource their management to third party corporations. The company that owns the nursing facility can shop around different management companies and pay them a fee to control the day to day operations. The management company designates a portion of its pay towards managing the facility and another portion as a management fee. The management company also receives a portion of the revenues from the home(s) it operates. These agreements are state approved agreements.

Balisok argues that the percentage the management companies takes off the top deprives the nursing homes of vital revenue needed to ensure quality care and services for the patients. The management companies do not operate for the good of the patients, but instead collect money off the top of the revenues and run the nursing facilities for as low a cost as possible.

An article in The Modesto Bee reported yesterday that Donna Darlene Palmer, former head nurse at a Placerville nursing home, will stand trial for felony elder abuse. Palmer and Rebecca Smith are the two nurses criminally charged by the California Attorney General for their involvement in the death of a 77-year-old Cameron Park woman. Palmer was the director of nursing at the time of the incident and Smith was one of her subordinates.

If you follow our Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect Blog, the name Johnnie Esco may sound familiar. Four and a half years ago, Johnnie Esco died at the age of 77 as a result of what her family and El Dorado County prosecutors believe was a case of elder abuse. Don Esco, Johnnie’s now deceased husband was a central figure in our previous blog. Mr. Esco pressed for criminal charges ever since his wife died in 2008.

Attorney General Kamala D. Harris recently announced plans to use three specialized teams comprised of healthcare professionals and investigators to increase its efforts to investigate and prosecute instances of criminal elder abuse in care facilities. Mr. Esco’s persistence over the last four years certainly played a role in bringing about more criminal investigations against nursing homes and their employees.

The Mercury News recently reported that a former commander in the Pinole Police Department, and his wife, have been charged with trying to defraud an 82-year-old Pleasanton woman. Matthew Messier, the 36-year-old former police commander was charged with several crimes including four counts of elder abuse. Messier and his wife attempted to defraud the elderly woman by placing her entire estate into a trust under their control.

The victim’s assets were estimated to be between $750,000 and $1 million.

The investigation began in July while Messier was still police commander with the Pinole Police Department. Messier used his position as police commander to gain the victim’s trust. The victim then began depositing funds into a trust controlled by Messiers. Messier had been with the police department since 2001, but he resigned his position October 21 of this year.

Families with loved ones in adult care facilities are pushing for new legislation that will affect how the facilities handle missing patient situations according to a recent article in the Mercury News. The legislation is not up for a vote yet, but if enacted, the law will require care facilities to contact authorities immediately once a resident is discovered missing or has failed to return at a scheduled time.

The two incidents highlighted in the article involve situations where mentally impaired adults went missing for several hours from the facilities whose care they were under. The facilities did not act quickly in either case.

Yolanda Membreno was an 86-year-old mentally impaired woman under the care of Julia’s Home. She went missing from the home on September 30th of this year. According to Roy Roberto, the man who operates Julia’s Home, their established protocol is to conduct their own search before contacting the police. In Membreno’s case, the staff followed protocol but that meant waiting an hour before contacting the police. Membreno was found dead on a playground only 100 yards away from the entrance to the care facility just a few hours after she went missing.

The California State Attorney General, Kamala D. Harris, has plans to “aggressively” pursue and build more criminal cases against nursing homes as reported in The Sacramento Bee.

Much of the article is discussed within the backdrop of Don Esco’s story. Mr. Esco recently died at the age of 82. The article describes how he measured the passage of time over the last couple of years by exactly how much time had passed since his wife’s death in 2008. Johnnie Esco, Mr. Esco’s wife of 61 years, spent just 13 days at a care center in Placerville before dying. Mr. Esco was convinced that it was a criminal matter, the state concurred and four years, seven months and 24 days after Mrs. Esco’s death one of the nurses charged in connection with the death pleaded no contest to the charge of felony elder abuse. Mr. Esco did not live long enough to see this development in the case, but his “persistence has made its mark on California” states the article.

Investigating and proving instances of elder abuse presents multiple challenges which requires more than the expertise of a single investigator. Attorney General Harris is forming specialized teams to investigate and pursue situations that potentially merit criminal charges. The three teams, two in Southern California and one in Sacramento, will consist of an attorney, a nurse, and an auditor. Each team will also be supported by a “medical person with a specialty in geriatrics” according to Harris’ office.

Dealing with abusive behavior from an in-home caregiver is a nightmare scenario for the victims and their loved ones. In previous blog posts, we discussed issues surrounding the selection of at home caregivers, but sometimes nefarious individuals slip through the cracks. In certain situations, firing an in-home caregiver suspected of abusive behavior will stop the immediate threat of additional physical harm. The threat of civil and criminal penalties will keep some criminals from continuing the abusive behavior. However, you do have additional remedies if you feel the threat of continued abuse. In a number of incidents, elderly individuals reported that abusive in-home caregivers threatened them with more severe abuse if they called the police or reported the behavior to friends or family. Additional remedies or measures must be taken in these situations.

The obvious first step is to call 911. If you are in immediate danger from your caregiver, letting them know that you are on the phone with the police and that help is on the way will hopefully scare them off. The police officers have the authority to contact a judicial officer who has the legal authority to issue an immediate Emergency Protective Order. This order prohibits the abusive caregiver from coming near you or contacting you in any way. This is an emergency order so it only remains in effect for 7 calendar days or 5 court days. This order is designed as an emergency measure that stops the immediate problem until a more permanent solution is implemented. By going this route, you start a paper trail to catalog the reported instances of abuse.

The next step to take is a Temporary Restraining Order. This will extend the Emergency Protective Order already in place with the same restrictions on any contact between the abuser and victim. This is a more formal order requiring you to fill out and file certain forms with the courthouse. The judge then must sign the Temporary Restraining Order and the order must be delivered to the abuser for it to go into effect.

Contact Information