Articles Posted in Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect

The quality of care provided by California nursing homes has declined by almost every measure since the implementation of a new Medi-Cal rate system that increased funding the nursing facilities according to a new study by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). Meanwhile, nursing home complaints and the issuance of deficiencies have grown dramatically since the rate hike.

Critics contend that the nursing home industry crafted the rate hike on the basis that it was necessary to improve care. And while staffing levels improved under the new law, nursing home staff turnovers increased. The study reveals that 144 nursing homes in California failed to meet state minimum staffing requirements (.pdf).

According to the California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform:

The signs and symptoms of a brain injury are not always as clear as you might think. Most patients who suffer a traumatic brain injury can walk, talk, and give the appearance of a normally functioning person. There are, however, symptoms that point to brain trauma.

The month of March is set aside to increase the awareness of traumatic brain injuries, which can be caused by a bump, blow, or jolt to the head. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that falls – particularly in people over age 75 – are the leading cause of brain injuries in the United States.

Those who care for the elderly should be aware of the symptoms of a brain injury. In a mild injury, a person might have a persistent headache, confused, or have blurred vision. Another symptoms is a lost of smell or taste. A more severe injury may cause vomiting, slurred speech or weakness in arms or legs.

Those of us who sue nursing homes and assisted living facilities for elder abuse and neglect of residents know how hard it is to uncover the evidence needed to meet our burdens of proof (which are higher than the typical case). Whether it’s proving a systemic problem of understaffing, ignoring resident fall risks, or establishing false charting, the victims of abuse or neglect always face tremendous hurdles in proving they were neglected. In reality, it’s usually the family trying to prove the wrongdoing since the victim is frequently dead because of the abuse or neglect.

What we certainly don’t need is nursing home caregivers, through their union representatives, colluding with industry trade groups to lobby against the rights of nursing home residents all in the name of job security and wages. This disturbing article in the San Francisco Weekly suggests that for the Service Employees International Union this might be a goal.

According to the article, the two-million-member SEIU, the country’s largest union, would offer political support for nursing home industry goals of limiting patients’ or families’ right to sue for abuse and neglect in exchange for the right to organize nursing home employees in a number of California nursing facilities. This collaboration has led to a division within union ranks, and a growing dispute between SEIU’s California healthcare affiliate and the national union office.

When there is sustained pressure in an area of skin that cuts off circulation to that area, the skin will start to breakdown creating what is common called a bedsore or pressure ulcer. If you’ve never seen one, consider yourself lucky. Not properly cared for, these sores and develop into wounds so deep that muscle and bone can sometimes be exposed.

It has been reported that two million Americans experienced pressure ulcers every year, usually the result of a combination of poor nutrition, dehydration, and immobility. Recent studies, however, suggest that fighting bedsores requires a team approach, enlisting not just the bedside caregivers, but many other nursing home employees.

A study by the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society involving 52 nursing homes around the United States reported a reduction of almost 70% of serious bedsores acquired in the facilities after utilizing a team approach to the prevention and treatment of sores.

Medicaid spends more money on antipsychotic drugs than any other prescription drug. Physicians are prescribing these powerful drugs in record numbers to nursing home residents in order to control their behavior, not for the treatment of psychotic illness.

It is reported that nearly 30% of the total nursing home population is receiving medication in a practice that is known as “off label use” of prescription drugs. It’s no surprise to lawyers who practice this area that studies also reveal that nearly 21% of nursing facility residents being given these drugs do not have a psychosis diagnosis.

“You walk into facilities where you see residents slumped over in their wheelchairs, their heads are hanging, and they’re out of it, and that is unacceptable,” says Christie Teigland, director of informatics research for the New York Association of Homes and Services for the Aging, a not-for-profit industry group. Her research, which she believes reflects national trends, shows that about one-third of dementia patients in New York’s nursing homes are on antipsychotics; some facilities have rates as high as 60% to 70%. “These drugs are being given way too much to this frail elderly population,” Dr. Teigland says.

Nursing home owners have claimed for years that they are barely getting by, and the lawsuits against them for negligent care are going to drive them out of business, leaving no place to put seniors. We reject this argument as a time-honored trick by tortfeasors to become the victims after causing harm to others. A New York Times article substantiated that the nursing home business is plenty profitable.

According to the Times, private takeover of nursing homes leads to poorer care, and increases the likelihood of nursing home abuse or neglect. A survey of complaints against more than 16,000 U.S. nursing homes found that care often deteriorates significantly after homes are acquired by large private investment firms.

The Times compared the number of complaints received against 1,200 nursing homes acquired by these for-profit firms against those of 14,000 other nursing homes.

The National Pressure Advisory Panel updated its definition of the four “stages” used to diagnose pressure ulcers or decubitus ulcers (often referred to as bed sores). It also added two new stages on deep-tissue injury and ulcers that cannot be staged. The updated stages of pressure ulcers were released at the conclusion of its 2007 annual conference held in San Antonio, Texas.

A pressure ulcer or bed sore is a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue, usually over a bony prominence as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction. In elderly or disabled patients, sores can begin on the skin of the tailbone, back, buttocks, heels, back of the head, or elbows. Poor nutrition or dehydration can weaken the skin and make it more vulnerable.

The new staging definitions are as follows:

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced last month that, it will no longer reimburse hospitals for treating eight “reasonably preventable” conditions as of October 2008 the Wall Street Journal reports. Pressure ulcers are among the most prevalent, costly and dangerous on the list. In addition to interfering with recovery, lengthening hospital stays and causing extreme pain and discomfort, pressure ulcers can increase the risk of infection, with nearly 60,000 deaths annually from hospital-acquired pressure ulcers.

Nursing homes and long-term-care facilities have made strides of their own in prevention, motivated in part by the costs of lawsuits for failure to prevent bed sores. Prevention methods can include using ultrasound to identify skin breakdown before a pressure sore forms, special pressure reducing mattresses and ensuring that residents are turned at least every two hours.

Despite the availability of these, and other, prevention techniques, nursing homes have long failed to do much to prevent pressure ulcers as they had no real incentive to do so (other than the fear of lawsuits). Most commonly, nursing homes save money by not having enough staff on hand to ensure that residents receive the treatments required. They are then “rewarded” for this behavior by Medicare paying them extra money per patient to treat the decubitus ulcers. As of October of 2008, nursing homes will instead have to “pay” to treat pressure ulcers which they cause. Hopefully this disincentive will result in better care for all nursing home residents.

The federal Older Americans Act provides funding to states to fulfill the goals of the Act, namely the protection of the vulnerable elderly population. To receive federal funds, states must comply with a variety of statutory requirements, including the formation of an office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman.

Under federal law, the designated state ombudsman may designate a local ombudsman office to provide services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of long-term care residents. It is the job of the local ombudsman to “identify, investigate, and resolve complaints made by or on behalf of residents that relate to action, inaction, or decisions, that may adversely affect the health, safety, welfare, or rights of the residents.” (42 U.S.C. §3058g(a)(5)(B)(iii).)

Generally, any concerns about resident rights issues, physical abuse or neglect, transfer and discharge issues, or any other unexpected injury, illness, infection or death should be reported to your local ombudsman office. Reports of elder abuse or neglect are confidential, and will not be revealed in any legal actions that might arise from the complaints.

The Nursing Home Complaint Investigation Improvement Act (AB 399), authored was approved last week in the Assembly Health Committee by a vote of 10-0. The legislation would fight abuse and neglect by improving the quality and timeliness of nursing home complaint investigations. AB 399 has over 30 registered supporters including the AARP, Congress of California Seniors, Gray Panthers, and Bet Tzedek Legal Services. There is no registered opposition.

According to the California Chronicle, AB 399 would require the Department of Health Services (DHS) to complete investigations within 40 working days; send complainants a written summary of findings about their complaint; investigate facility-reported complaints of abuse and neglect within the same time frames as public complaints; and extend the number of days a complainant has to seek an informal conference from five business days to 15 days after receipt of the determination.

“Today’s vote is an important step toward restoring public confidence in California’s nursing home oversight system,” said Michael Connors of California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR). “Timely DHS investigations will help ensure that nursing home residents are protected from further neglect and abuse once it’s been reported.”

Contact Information